Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-29

  • RT @NeilWithers: Nobel prize prediction starts early at ChemBark http://trunc.it/aladh #
  • RT @morphosaurus Stages Of Succession On University Applications http://goo.gl/fb/rwe07 #
  • RT @Allochthonous: Interesting post from co-blogger @highlyanne: [Edinburgh] Castle geology http://bit.ly/cTeQgQ #
  • @LouiseJJohnson some Tesco extras stock it too. Absolutely love cooking with it ;) in reply to LouiseJJohnson #
  • marking in august = extreme misery #
  • currently trying to work out what I'll be wearing next Thursday…so I can make my ppt presentation match :) #
  • http://bbc.in/b4VZVOA man who attacked pregnant girlfriend has sentence cut after judge held both responsible for "difficult relationship". #
  • Re last tweet. A difficult relationship NEVER excuses violence against women (or violence of any kind). #
  • In my living room tonight – you'd think it was November, not August. But it is pretty cold so am glad of the stove http://yfrog.com/n96e0j #
  • Strange dreams last night – I was writing exam questions…they were actually half decent so am now writing them down before I forget them! #
  • Found: noisy black cat ST5/ CW3 postcodes, now refusing to leave our garden! hard to type with cat on lap! Please RT #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Got a question? What’s next?

I wrote a few weeks ago about phrasing research questions and did so in a fairly generic way.  I didn’t touch on how you find a good research question, a problem worth working on.

Research can be incremental, working carefully through possibilities and adding to the sum of knowledge about a specific sub-field.  For example, synthesizing all molecules with 10 carbon atoms and an amine (NH2) group. We’d learn quite a bit about synthesis by attempting this, and contribute some new synthetic procedures for specific compounds to the field of synthetic chemistry.  Once we’d finished that task, we could synthesise all molecules with 11 carbon atoms an amine group.  There is a reasonable chance that this work could be published, particularly if some of those amines were ‘new to science’ (never reported in literature before), but it wouldn’t and shouldn’t be a particularly high impact publication.  Repetitive reuse of the same techniques to produce subtly different results is not the stuff of blockbuster discoveries.

The stuff of blockbuster discoveries is making a leap from our current understanding of a problem into the unknown.  By space I mean an area in which little research to date has been done.  A good way to visualize this for synthetic chemistry is to take a look at Grzybowski et al. Nature Chemistry 2009 (1) 31 (doi:10.1038/nchem.136).  This perspective article describes visualising known compounds as a network, starting with simple compounds as nodes, and connecting them by synthetic steps.   The result is a 3D representation of synthetic chemicals and routes to them. Some areas are intensively researched and represented as dense areas on the map.  Other areas are relatively empty and may either represent an under researched area of synthetic chemistry, or a frontier of synthesis where no one has yet found a route in.  That’s the kind of space you want to find if you’re into big discoveries.

A Dandelion Clock – network like in structure! Source

Perhaps it is more difficult now to find those spaces to research in – the low hanging fruits of chemistry have been picked, and the problems are increasingly complex, sometimes with increasingly obscure solutions.  If you could visualise your sub-field as a 3D map, where would your research be?  Would it be in a densely populated area, constantly trying to avoid colliding with someone else’s efforts? Or would it be out in the voids, breaking new ground?  You don’t need to find a big space, just one that is relevant and as yet overlooked.

I don’t mean to imply that incremental research is not as worthy as big leaps.  Quite the contrary actually.   Without patient and diligent efforts to syntheses many libraries of compounds based on a steroid or antibiotic core structure, we wouldn’t have many of the medicines we take for granted.  Without concerted effort to refine and improve existing chemical processes, we wouldn’t have many of the bulk  chemical feed stocks so critical for synthesising advanced materials such as polymers.

The only way you can find those research problems is to read well in the area you are interested in, and read fairly well across the field.  What have people already done?  Why did they do it that way?  Sometimes the ideas just jump out at you when you are least expecting them!

Variety in Chemistry Education 2010

Next week I’m off to present an Oral Byte at the Variety in Chemistry Education conference in Loughborough.  Due to a minor scheduling class I’m there on the Thursday then off to London for Science Online London 2010 hideously early on the Friday morning. (I had to rebook my tickets after they published the programme for SOLO10 because the website said a noon start, the programme says a 10 am start – bah humbug advanced non-refundable rail tickets).

Continue reading Variety in Chemistry Education 2010

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-22

Powered by Twitter Tools

POSS Dendrimers for Drug Delivery

ResearchBlogging.org

Drug delivery is an area of research on the border of pharmaceutical science and medicinal chemistry.  My experience of drug delivery is mainly concerned with using polymers to devise new ways of getting approved drugs into the human body.  For example, a drug used in chemotherapy may well have extensive side effects when administered to a patient by intra venous infusion, yet conjugating it to a polymer and providing some kind of targeting mechanism may reduce the side effects by only releasing the active drug molecule in the target tissue.  Targetting mechanisms may be either active, attaching a molecule that will bind to another molecule only found in the target tissue, or passive, exploting the enhanced permability and retention effect (EPR).  The EPR effect is simply that particles within a certain size will accumulate in tumor tissue to a greater extent than in normal tissue[1].

I’m interested in dendrimers for drug delivery because they have precisely defined size and structure and therefore overcome some of the issues with other polymeric architecture.  Dendrimers are very time consuming to synthesise, requiring very high yielding reactions and many steps to obtain molecules in the size range 10 – 50 nm.  A way to work around this is to use a polyhedral oligomeric silisesquioxane (POSS) core which is a small cubic molecule comprising 8 silicon atoms at each corner of the cube, linked by 12 oxygen.  A functional group (H, propylamine etc) exists at each corner and can be used to synthesise the dendrimer from.  Note: these molecules are extremely beautiful with high symmetry and snowflake like structure.

Adapted from [2] Kaneshiro et al.  Molecular Pharmaceutics, 2007 (4) 759, drawn by KJHaxton.

This molecule has the POSS core in the centre, and poly (L-lysine) branches radiating from each of the 8 corners.   You may recognise the POSS core from the header image on this blog.  The periphery of the molecule has primary amine terminal groups.  Kaneshiro and coworkers used this dendrimer for gene delivery [2] and also for delivery of the chemotherapy agent doxorubicin [3].  The dendrimer-drug conjugate was targetted to tumor cells via  short RGD peptide sequence.

A more recent paper using POSS cores and poly (amino acid) dendrimers was published by Yuan et al. [4].  This time, a poly (L-glutamic acid) dendrimer with a POSS core was prepared and used for drug delivery of doxorubicin, this time using biotin as a targeting group.   These dendrimer-drug conjugates were found to be around 30 nm in size and should be nearly spherical in shape (globular).  Interestingly, the doxorubicin was conjugated via  a pH sensitive hydrazone bond.  This is important because little drug was released through cleaveage of this bond at pH 7.4, the pH found in the blood stream, but extensive drug release was measured at pH 5.0, the pH found around tumor tissue.  The combination of low release in the blood stream and both an active and passive targeting mechanism increase the chances of the dose being distributed preferentially into the tumor tissues.

My interest in this work is mainly due to the synthesis of complex and beautiful molecules that have a useful function.  These papers caught my eye because I’m interested in organic-inorganic hybrid materials and have worked with the POSS core.  These papers describe the synthesis, characterisation and preliminary drug release and in vitro studies, assessing these dendrimers as drug delivery vehicles.  The drawbacks of using a dendrimer system, even with a POSS core, is the complex synthetic route required to make the molecule and conjugate the drug and targeting system to it.  These papers represent the initial steps in a very long program of research that could involve intensive cell culture (in vitro) studies, many animal studies (in vivo) before anything like a human trial of these systems could take place.  The evidence presented in these papers suggests that these are potentially very useful systems, but to realise that potential is a very long and very expensive path indeed.

Refs:

[1] Maeda H (2001). The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. Advances in enzyme regulation, 41, 189-207 PMID: 11384745

[2] Kaneshiro, T., Wang, X., & Lu, Z. (2007). Synthesis, Characterization, and Gene Delivery of Poly-

-lysine Octa(3-aminopropyl)silsesquioxane Dendrimers: Nanoglobular Drug Carriers with Precisely Defined Molecular Architectures
Molecular Pharmaceutics, 4 (5), 759-768 DOI: 10.1021/mp070036z

[3]  Kaneshiro, T., & Lu, Z. (2009). Targeted intracellular codelivery of chemotherapeutics and nucleic acid with a well-defined dendrimer-based nanoglobular carrier Biomaterials, 30 (29), 5660-5666 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.026

[4]  Yuan, H., Luo, K., Lai, Y., Pu, Y., He, B., Wang, G., Wu, Y., & Gu, Z. (2010). A Novel Poly( -glutamic acid) Dendrimer Based Drug Delivery System with Both pH-Sensitive and Targeting Functions Molecular Pharmaceutics, 7 (4), 953-962 DOI: 10.1021/mp1000923

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-15

Powered by Twitter Tools

A question of questions…

I was asked a few weeks ago to give some advice on how to write a research proposal.  I’m neither qualified nor able to give a definitive  guide to writing a research proposal.  I can, however, describe the process that I  go through, and make a few suggestions.

The first thing you need is  a research question.  This doesn’t need to be phrased as a question but it can be.  I suspect some areas of science would call this the hypothesis but I don’t generally think in those terms.  As I think about it, there are probably two kinds of questions: one that proposes a piece of research as  a solution to a problem; one that proposes a piece of research for its own sake.  Most of my research questions are framed in problem solving terms because I find it easier to identify a problem, define the limits within which the ideal solution resides and come up with a chemical system that meets the requirements.

The generic format of problem based questions would be : Can [RESEARCH] be used to solve [PROBLEM]?  For example, can dendrimers be used to deliver anticancer drugs and reduce side effects? [Research = dendrimer drug delivery of chemotherapy; problem  = chemotherapy has side effects]  Or, can dendrimers be used to remediate heavy metals from ground water? [Research = dendrimer chelators; problem = heavy metal contamination of ground water].

The generic format of research for its own sake questions could be: Can [RESEARCH IDEA] be done?  For example, can molecules with highly branched and perfect architectures be synthesised? [Research = dendrimer chemistry].

Now, I’ll play cynic for a while here and note that with the drive towards greater commercialisation of research, problem based questions may be seen as more popular, with greater potential.  That is not necessarily a position I agree with and is very much field dependent.   We also have to remember that not all questions are created equal, and not all problems are equally worthy of solving.   Again that’s often field (and grant scheme) specific.

Part 2: Got a question? What’s next?  – coming soon…

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-08

Heffernan NYT Mag article

British Science Festiaval

Chemical Free products:

  • What are they made of? Energy? http://bit.ly/dz5zYD “Eco Balls are THE choice for the modern consumer. Not only are they chemical-free” #
  • Re last tweet. Its OK folks, they produce ionized oxygen by way of mineral salts. So totally chemical free then *sarcasm* #

OED Unused Words:

Misc RT and blog posts:

Powered by Twitter Tools

Online Chemistry Resources

I’ve started a new page on this site: ‘Chemistry Online‘ (see bar above header image).  I’d like to compile a list that demonstrates the diversity of online chemistry resources.  I’ve started off with blogs, a couple of open science initiatives, the Periodic Table of Videos, and the 3 major publishing outlets for chemistry (Nature Chem, ACS and RSC).  I’m limited by my own experience here so feel free to jump in with links in the comments on this post, or on the page.  If you disagree with my classification of any sites, let me know.

Twitter is good too, I’m @kjhaxton and if you use #bsfchem then I’ll be able to collect all the links together easily.

This list is to support our session at the British Science Festival in September called ‘The Armchair Chemist Online‘.

September Epic

September is shaping up to be a busy month.

It all starts on the 2nd of September when I’m off to the Variety in Chemistry Education conference over at Loughborough University. I’m presenting an oral byte called ‘From lo-tech to high-tech: Teaching spectroscopy with the writing on the wall’ which is restricted to 5 minutes in length and a maximum of 3 powerpoint slides.  I’ll post the abstract here and some background on the project later this week.  I’m only at ViCE for the first day because on the 3rd of September it’s off to London to Science Online London 2010.

Science Online London 2010

I’ve been to this conference for the past two years and enjoyed it a great deal.  This year it has moved from the Royal Institution to the British Library and is now over 2 days.  The preliminary programme and session suggestions look amazing so I’m hoping it will be great.  I’ll be in London 3rd and 4th of September for that,

and probably at a loose end on the Friday night so if anyone fancies a couple of pints somewhere, get in touch.  I think there are probably some evening events associated with the conference.

On the 16th of September I’ll be at the British Science Festival in Birmingham taking part in a session called ‘The Armchair Chemist Online‘.  I’m sure I’ll be blogging a lot more about this session in the next couple of weeks but we’ve got some great speakers who are going to talk about various aspects of chemistry online, from journals to youtube and  how social media can be a great way to get people involved in real live outreach events.  I’m planning to be at the Science Festival on the 15th of September and again if anyone wants to meet up, let me know. I’m still planning which sessions I want to go to.

September will rapidly hurtle to its conclusion with an internal research conference that I’m involved with organising.  All researchers at my university are based in research institutes and mine has an annual conference day, with speakers from a broad range of disciplines (from maths to chemistry via earth sciences, physics and astrophysics and forensic and computer science).  I’m hoping that all the technical bits and pieces will be sorted before the end of August and all that will be left to do on the day will be to take photos of each speaker giving their talk!

Then on the 27th of September, its all over.  The academic year begins again and I get to help register our incoming first year.  Then it will be all about the teaching until Christmas!